Comments on: Gillette Fusion http://irgeek.net/archives/2006/02/21/gillette-fusion/ Random Musings of a Random Geek Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:56:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Dewayne Mikkelson http://irgeek.net/archives/2006/02/21/gillette-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-3598 Dewayne Mikkelson Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:34:56 +0000 http://irgeek.net/archives/2006/02/21/gillette-fusion/#comment-3598 I would NOT give up my new fusion for anything. The five blades are a LOT easier on my face than the Mach 3 was and the new single blade lets me get to places that I was NOT able to get to with the 3. Under the Nose in particular was a gnarly place that was rarely touched before but that single blade on the back makes it a piece of cake to finish. I would NOT give up my new fusion for anything. The five blades are a LOT easier on my face than the Mach 3 was and the new single blade lets me get to places that I was NOT able to get to with the 3. Under the Nose in particular was a gnarly place that was rarely touched before but that single blade on the back makes it a piece of cake to finish.

]]> By: Pablo http://irgeek.net/archives/2006/02/21/gillette-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-3591 Pablo Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:26:24 +0000 http://irgeek.net/archives/2006/02/21/gillette-fusion/#comment-3591 :-D :-D

]]> By: Laundro http://irgeek.net/archives/2006/02/21/gillette-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-3590 Laundro Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:08:51 +0000 http://irgeek.net/archives/2006/02/21/gillette-fusion/#comment-3590 Well before I poopoo it more, I will try it out for myself... ;) Well before I poopoo it more, I will try it out for myself… ;)

]]> By: Pablo http://irgeek.net/archives/2006/02/21/gillette-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-3589 Pablo Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:06:37 +0000 http://irgeek.net/archives/2006/02/21/gillette-fusion/#comment-3589 I dunno man, I use the extra blade on the back to pick up little bits of stuff that the 5 blades on the front would take to much out of. Like if a line isn't totally straight I don't wanna go back in there with the 5 blades and possibly take to much off ... i've done that before =/ The extra blade did pretty well with the details for me, and it was much better at shaving the upper lip than even the 3 blade system, let alone the 5 blade system. But to each thier own :-) I dunno man, I use the extra blade on the back to pick up little bits of stuff that the 5 blades on the front would take to much out of. Like if a line isn’t totally straight I don’t wanna go back in there with the 5 blades and possibly take to much off … i’ve done that before =/

The extra blade did pretty well with the details for me, and it was much better at shaving the upper lip than even the 3 blade system, let alone the 5 blade system. But to each thier own :-)

]]> By: Laundro http://irgeek.net/archives/2006/02/21/gillette-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-3586 Laundro Wed, 22 Feb 2006 03:13:16 +0000 http://irgeek.net/archives/2006/02/21/gillette-fusion/#comment-3586 That razor on the back is kind of dumb... How is it any different than the 4 blade on the other side?! That single blade appears to be clearly emulating a function that the main trimmers can't do... ie. details and side burns... This extra blade is just a bad gimmick to me... That razor on the back is kind of dumb… How is it any different than the 4 blade on the other side?!

That single blade appears to be clearly emulating a function that the main trimmers can’t do… ie. details and side burns…

This extra blade is just a bad gimmick to me…

]]>